welcome and stuff

Greetings! Use labels below to filter so you can read about union disputes, where i'm on holiday, revolutionary politics, or just what i have said in the last 7 days. Ta

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

unions postpone action for talks?

According to unison website tonight the NJC has called off action for talks. See here

forgive me for posting quickly, but we need to respond to this quickly

whats wrong with this picture?

after an upbeat mood from the membership and a very successful (even if more patchy in some parts) two days of action, we have not lifted the pressure by suspending action until September?

so we have agreement of talks (with no dates or timetables as yet)

yes we want the employers to come back to the table and since they said 2.45% was the final offer, if this means the employers are ready to increase this figure substaintially then good we should talk, but and its a big but, why lift the threat of further action.

were the NJC given a proposed figure that the employer would come up with? were the NJC convinced that the offer was good enough to not need the threat of further action?

we should be calling the shots more, keeping the pressure on. if they have agreed to talk then this is thanks to our action, we should at the very least agreed for the NJC to meet again in a week or 10 days time to set dates for further action if the employers offer was not worth putting to the membership,

but telling the employers we're calling off action, and will discuss again in September gives the employer the upper hand, they can string out discussions believing that as each day passes the membership will be less motivated to more action, with rumours about what amount we would be offered / accept misdirecting the membership, perhaps the delays would mean we would need the expense of another ballot for action in the autumn.

this is not inevitable with rallies, public meetings and getting public sector workers and service users together including political campaigning can prevent the membership from stepping down, but by agreeing to postpone even talk of further action until september when we are still in july doesnt help those of us who want to keep our members mobilised for action if and when necessary

could not this time while talking with employers have been used usefully to discuss the types of action with the regions and open activist meetings in every locality, i.e. discussing if selective action would work, if not why not and if yes, how would we improve on how it was used learning lessons from london weighting etc

we still need to ensure regions call these meetings, even if full timers are happy for us to wait

Ed

join more discussion on this locgovactivists list or post to this blog

1 comment:

marshajane said...

It was suggested at tolpuddle that i invite you to contribute on my blog and before I could do it youve set your own one up!

Oh well nevermind.

I agree that it was wrong not to set a date for the next strike action but being as no one in their right minds things we should strike again before september anyway, and as long as we do not let the bureacracy demobilise the campaign then nothing is lost.

Of course the optimistic me thinks that if our leadership are playing clever and have agreed this knowing it wont disadvantage us but that it will get a further offer then great lets see what the employers say. (because of course we do want them to make a further offer and if we can manage a decent pay offer over 2 days action fantastic)

It is however even more important now to get this (or a version of this) motion into your regional SGE's and then onto National SGE.